Madagascar in the headlines again! And again!
Ornithologists at Cornell University were able to show that a bird from the rainforest, a club-winged manakin, made their mating sounds by rubbing their wings together! How cool is that? Really, it is cool. Watch the video and see below for an explanation.
Special thanks to my Mom for telling me about this little bird. Love you Mom!
This finch-sized bird just lifts its wings above its back. Big deal, right? That “lift” makes the noise. How? Slow motion video showed that the bird’s wings were a blur. This means that the bird was probably rubbing its wings together to make the sound. Dr. Kimberly Bostwick got herself a better digital video camera that could take 1000 frames per second. She finally was able to see the wing movement (you can too). It turns out that the bird is rubbing its wings together about 100 times a second. That is twice as fast as a humming bird.
The frequency of the sound that was recorded was about 1400 hertz. That is quite a bit more than 100 hertz (wing beats per second). Dr. Bostwick was still missing a piece of the puzzle. She needed what she called a “frequency multiplier”. She looked more closely at the wing morphology of the bird. She found her frequency multiplier in the feathers. When the bird moves its wings, 2 special feathers rub together. See the illustration and caption on left for an explanation. The short answer is: cello and bow. One hundred times per SECOND. Beat that Yo Yo Mah!
These birds make the sound similar to the way crickets do. This shows that this type of sound making is not limited to insects, an amazing discovery. Evolution once again teaches us that no matter how much we may want to neatly put things in separate categories, life is just not that simple.
“…from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been, and are being, evolved.” Charles Darwin, last sentence from the Origin of Species.
Madagascar in the headlines again! And again!
Analysis of human DNA has allowed researchers to refine theories about early human migrations such as the “Out of Africa” theory and how humans eventually got to North and South America.
Some very well known examples of this type of genomic and mitochondrial DNA work are summarized in the excellent books Journey of Man and Deep Ancestry by Spencer Wells and The Seven Daughters of Eve and Saxons, Vikings, & Celts by Bryan Sykes.
This type of genetic research is the obvious way to obtain information on human migrations. Yes, I’m implying there is another (less obvious?) way to gather information.
Researchers can use the “companions” we bring along with us when we move. A recent study about mice (Fellow Travelers) is “in press” at the moment at the BioMed Central (BMC) Evolutionary Biology journal. The researchers have documented that mice in Greenland are descended from mice in Norway. The Greenland mice must have come from Norwegian forebears that stowed away on the journey to Greenland. Very nice additional evidence to support the timeline of Viking wanderings.
Dr. David Reed has learned about humans by using one of our very close companions. Dr. Reed studies ectoparasites, and has done considerable genomic work in lice. By studying lice, he found that body lice diverged from head lice about 170,000 years ago. Body lice require clothing to hide in. Therefore, according to Reed and his coworkers, clothing must have appeared on humans about 170,000 years ago. In his 2011 paper Reed says
A suite of complex behaviors and technologies associated with the transition of archaic to modern Homo sapiens, including improved clothing, are credited with facilitating the successful expansion of AMH [anatomically modern humans] out of Africa into higher latitudes.
The Smithsonian Natural History Museum has finished a great looking exhibit “The Hall of Human Origins“. From online, it looks like it has the latest info on our human family tree along with some spectacular artwork and sculptures to bring it to life.
This is on my list of things to see this summer. I know, I have a big “G” on my forehead. As a good friend of my husband’s once shouted (while standing in a parking lot holding a big-ass trophy we had won at a Star Trek convention), “We may be geeks, but we’re the best geeks!”
I plan to post a review of my trip and let you all know how much fun we had.
It turns out being a descendent isn’t as clear cut as it seems. As sequences of genomes fill the digital world, their analyses surprise many evolutionary biologists. It is hard to define exactly what a species is. Where do you draw the line between species? Wolves and dogs are clearly different. What about wolves and coyotes? Wolves and huskies? Coyotes and dogs? Labs and Newfies? Mutts and purebreds?
We have a habit of standing where we are and looking back in increments. How else can we learn about our world? Well, scientifically, we are growing up very fast, and need new perspectives. Just because the only information we have is that of clear, distinct species in a neat branching tree doesn’t mean that act of speciation is a neat business. In fact, I’m willing bet the farm that as we study genomes, we will find speciation is messy and “blurry” and species can only be distinctly identified long after the “speciation event”.
If there is even a single event. In some cases there may be a single change that allowed a new species to survive and the old to become extinct. I suspect that for many species (most?) it’s a continuum and that once you get far enough along the continuum, the species are then very distinct. Kind of like the visible spectrum. What’s the difference between 695nm and 700nm? Both are still red light. Once you get to 600nm, however, the light is very clearly orange. Can’t confuse those two colors. I think speciation is likely to the same way. At the very least, different species have interbred in the distant past, making the creation of family trees a bit more challenging.
Here are few stories about finding the “blurriness” in species by comparing genome sequences.
What are these things? Icicles? Stalactites? Here’s a hint: chomp!
It’s been around a long time, but us humans have just gotten around to seeing it. Shark species are becoming extinct worldwide, and one expert estimates that of the species present ~50 years ago, 90% have become extinct. Since it is now clear there are species out there we’ve never encountered, there are probably even more species becoming extinct than what we are aware of. Ignorance is bliss? No, more like extinction.
Smallest lizard EVER! Well, in a tight race with a few others. Brookesia micra was recently found in Madagascar. The picture is linked to an evolution learning site at UC Berkeley, but you can read the primary journal article (just like a research biologist) in the journal PLoS ONE. PLoS is the Public Library of Science. PLoSONE is one of the many scientific journals it publishes.
Where did all of Madagascar’s species come from?
If you follow evolution surprises in the news, you may start wonder why so many come from Madagascar. You’re not the only one. Check out the link to see why this may be.